QIWU EVIDENCE STANDARD

Evidence should reveal the process—not just the outcome.

A result without its original reasoning is difficult to evaluate. QIWU’s evidence standard is designed to make the analytical process visible before and after the outcome is known.

01

What a case review should contain

  • Analysis date and time, market, instrument and timeframe
  • Original chart or input and methodology version
  • Initial observations, primary scenario and alternative scenario
  • Illustrative entry zone, invalidation level and target area where relevant
  • Defined follow-up window and subsequent outcome
  • Invalidation, error, missed condition, limitations and risk disclosure
02

Three evidence labels

  • Historical case review — Dates, original input, review window and selection method must be disclosed.
  • Simulation — Inputs, rules, exclusions and the hypothetical nature of results must be disclosed.
  • Live or forward observation — Timestamp, original scenario, updates and final review must be preserved.
03

What QIWU will not present as evidence

  • An isolated profit screenshot without the original analysis
  • A selected winning result presented as typical
  • A win-rate figure without a defined sample and methodology
  • A simulation presented as an actual investment result
  • A backtest presented as a guarantee of future performance
  • Testimonials rewritten into investment promises
04

Even a well-documented historical case cannot establish what will happen in a future market. Evidence can improve reviewability; it cannot remove uncertainty.

How to read a QIWU case review

  • Read the original scenario before viewing the outcome.
  • Check what would have invalidated the scenario.
  • Compare the primary and alternative paths.
  • Review the time horizon and whether costs were included.
  • Evaluate the process separately from the financial result.

Continue exploring the QIWU ecosystem.

Read the FAQ